Trial begins over killing of Samantha Josephson, who was stabbed

A South Carolina student was kidnapped and killed.
She got on the young man’s car thinking it was her Uber and the reality was very different.
Although the case dates from 2019, the trial over her murder began this year.

In 2019 there was a case that shocked the entire country, since it involved the death of a minor who was stabbed more than a hundred times by a subject who posed as the Uber that she was waiting for; the story grew on a grand scale, when the way in which the young woman had been killed was made public and that made many people begin to think that taxi transports are a danger to the youth community.

Two and a half years after her death, a trial began, where the jury heard the statements of the young man who posed as the young woman’s Uber driver, in addition to the testimonies of witnesses who were present the day the young woman died and of the people who claimed to see the defendant ‘clean’ a blade that was the one that was used to end the life of Samantha.

Samantha Josephson murdered Uber: The trial began

After two and a half years of anxiety for Samantha Josephson’s relatives, she finally began the trial that would take her alleged murderer behind bars, who in cold blood ended up stabbing her after kidnapping her when the young woman thought she had entered her Uber . The story in 2019 went around the world and without thinking, changed the rules for the safety of transport users in applications.

According to the Daily Mail, the trial began on the first day, with the comments of the prosecutors, where they say that: “A man from South Carolina left a 21-year-old college student with more than 100 stab wounds, cuts and other abrasions after kidnapping her when she mistook her car for her Uber ride after a night out in 2019. Filed Under: Samantha Josephson murdered Uber

Samantha Josephson murdered Uber: The young woman was at a celebration

It all started when Samantha Josephson was with her friends in the ‘Five Points’ entertainment area of Columbia, on March 29, 2019, when she allegedly entered the defendant’s car thinking he was an Uber driver. It was shortly afterwards that it became known that the young woman was murdered by Nathaniel Rowland.

Her fate from that moment on was uncertain, since the young woman kept in contact with her partner but after one in the morning, communication and the young woman’s whereabouts were lost; quickly there was a mobilization of the authorities that began at the request of the victim’s family, who kept hoping to find her, but unfortunately that was not what happened. Filed Under: Samantha Josephson Killed Uber

Samantha Josephson murdered Uber: He kept the girl in his car

According to the news outlets, prosecutors said during opening statements that Rowland kept Josephson in his car for hours as he drove more than 65 miles, before killing her and dumping her body in the woods near her family home. , with torn clothes, quite serious injuries and their belongings.

The way the victim’s body was found was atrocious, he was covered in stab wounds to the head, neck, face, upper body, legs and feet. Those who began the investigation of what had happened, began to gather information that would lead them to the murderer, who cruelly stabbed her a hundred times without caring that the young woman, who, according to the evidence found, tried to defend herself from the attack of her murderer, without being able to change his destiny. Filed Under: Samantha Josephson Killed Uber

Samantha Josephson murdered Uber: The evidence was presented to the jury

According to the New York Post, jurors will be shown a security video, cell phone data and a murder weapon that connects Rowland, 27, to the death of the University of California senior. South Carolina; The security video shows the last moments of Samantha’s life, who confidently got into the vehicle without imagining that the person who was driving would be the one who would end her life.

This moment happened when, upon opening the arguments at the Richland County Judicial Center in Columbia, prosecutors previewed the evidence and testimony that they said would implicate Rowland, most notably that of a young man who observed how the accused cleaned his blade and that would be the one that ended up taking Samantha’s life. Filed Under: Samantha Josephson Killed Uber

Samantha Josephson murdered Uber: «Intentional acts»

According to local media, it was Fifth Circuit Attorney Byron Gipson who mentioned during the trial that cameras in the entertainment area captured Rowland driving his black Chevrolet Impala around the block several times before stopping. with Josephson, who waited alone for the arrival of his Uber.

It is those willful, heinous, cruel and malicious intentional acts that Nathaniel David Rowland has been accused of kidnapping Samantha Josephson. «He has been accused of murdering Samantha Josephson,» Gipson told the court, who listened attentively to the testimonies and evidence offered for the trial, according to the Daily Mail. Filed Under: Samantha Josephson murdered Uber

Nathaniel had his eyes on Samantha

Were the statements dthe attorney who surprised the jury, Since he assures that he was stalking her all night while she was celebrating, without anyone noticing he had already hatched the plan to take Samantha and perform his atrocious torture that resulted in the death of Josephson, who only wanted to celebrate with your friends.

«He had his eyes firmly fixed on their future and his eyes firmly fixed on their love for each other,» Gibson commented to the grand jury. “But what they didn’t realize… what they never realized is that the defendant, Nathaniel David Rowland, had his eyes fixed on Samantha Josephson. She had her eyes on Ms. Josephson as she was walking alone outside the Bird Dog Lounge in Five Points, while walking outside, as she had requested an Uber ride, alone, ”she concluded her statement.

Pleads not guilty

According to The Sun, the young Nathaniel David Rowland pleaded not guilty to the charges and stood firm on it, arguing that he was not the one who murdered Samantha, even if the evidence said otherwise, since the security video is where The young woman is seen approaching that unit and matches the license plates and the model that the alleged culprit was driving at that time.

The trial became quite close, when it was the turn of Rowland’s defenders to come out to testify and establish a dialogue, where they affirmed that their client could not have murdered Samantha in addition to recriminating that he was imprisoned from a day after the meeting of the corpse of the young woman, so it was an injustice to the young man.

The defense lawyers part

According to the report that was presented to the media, it is mentioned that the defense lawyers of the defendant had said that Rowland was not related to the murder of Samantha, because they had the DNA evidence, which was taken after that Josephson’s body was found in a wooded area about 65 miles away from the alleged abduction.

«Ladies and gentlemen, I want you to listen to this number again, which is zero,» attorney Tracy Pinnock told the jury. That’s the amount of DNA in Samantha Josephson’s body that matches Nathaniel Rowland. Zero. It’s not on your clothes. It is not under your ripped and ripped nails. It is not on his ankles, «was his defense for his client.

Rowland requested a new attorney

The scandal of the trial that it initiated, brought with it details that the local press and the lawyers did not allow to ignore, such as the fact that Rowland requested a new lawyer, alleging that Pinnock, his public defender, was not “prepared and was only disorderly ”, something that did not seem correct to him in a trial that could mean the total loss of his freedom.

According to New York Post, the defendant mentioned that: «I feel like she is not fighting for me as she would for herself,» he told Judge Clifton Newman, during a lull in jury selection. But his efforts were in vain, when the judge refused to pause the process, and Rowland later that day said he was satisfied with his representation.

He would face life in prison

But why was he detained if his DNA was not found on the victim? According to expert reports, police said his blood and mobile phone were found in Rowland’s car, as well as bleach and cleaning equipment, making him the main suspect in the young woman’s death. .

If found guilty, Nathaniel Rowland will face life in prison without parole, so this trial meant that his freedom was at stake and therefore he was ‘extremely upset’ with the work that his defense attorney was having at the trial, since In his opinion, he hadn’t prepared himself enough to have a defense to help him.

For this case Uber demanded to show driver’s IDs

There have been relevant changes since Samantha Josephson’s cause of death was revealed, the perfect example is that South Carolina lawmakers enacted a measure that requires drivers to make license plate numbers visible on the front of their vehicles and creates criminal penalties for people posing as transportation drivers.

And one rule in particular that modified an app globally, leading Uber to require drivers to display prominent identification and say passenger names before traveling, so if you ride this method of transportation, you now know the why. what your driver will say your name first, so you can start the trip.

The post Killer trial begins for Samantha Josephson who was stabbed 100 times by a man she thought was her Uber appeared first on Hispanic World.